What if we stopped ranking everything?
by Ari Weinzweig
Eugene Ionesco once said, âIt is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.â So hereâs a question: What if we didnât think hierarchically? What if we stopped insisting on ranking almost everything from best to worst? What if we werenât worried about “who was the greatest”?
Buried near the back of Part 3 of the Guide to Good Leading series is an essay that I have given only minimal attention to since I wrote it. Weâve never released Secret #38, as we have so many others, as a single pamphlet. Iâve never done a keynote on it, and itâs not a segment in ZingTrainâs amazing training seminars. I do reference the concept, but itâs usually only in passing and to highlight another point I was already trying to make. But mostly itâs a shy introvert of a thought, sitting quietly in the corner while the other essays around it dominate the conversation. It has, I suppose, remained more of a âsecretâ than maybe it ought to be. As we work through the challenges of the moment, it struck me the other day that this might be the time to bring it out of the intellectual closet and share it more actively here.
Our businesses mirror how we think.
The key takeaway from Secret #38 is simple. It has, over the last five or six years, had a significant impact on me. Hereâs the deal: The way we as leaders thinkâeven if itâs quietly inside our headsâwill be manifested in the way our organizations work. As Mahatma Gandhi once said, âA man is but the product of his thoughts. What he thinks, he becomes.â There are many manifestations and interesting implications that came from this realization. If you want to read the whole essay, email me and Iâll send you a PDF for freeânormally we sell them, but letâs put the spirit of generosity before the sale. If we can get clear on the kind of organization (or community) we want to have, then our challenge is to change the way we think to be congruent with the kind of organizational culture we want to create. Because when it comes down to it, our organizations are essentially mirroring our minds.
Putting an end to hierarchal thinking.
The section of Secret #38 thatâs been on my mind a lot of late is about the issues that emerge from hierarchical thinking. I wrote about the subject in the forthcoming pamphlet, âA Humble Inquiry into Humility”:
Most of us, at least in the U.S., have been raised to think hierarchically. But since everyone around us also thinks hierarchically, most people tend to assume something along the lines of âthatâs just how people think,â or, âthatâs the way the world is.â (Itâs a bit like the story of the fish who, while swimming one day with his buddy, heard his friend make a comment about one of their colleagues being like a âfish out of water.â âWhatâs water?â the other fish wondered. Moral of the storyâwhen weâre surrounded by something all the time itâs hard to realize what, for better or for worse, weâre in the middle of.)
Hierarchical thinking dictates that things are to be ranked in order of value. Highest to lowest; best to worst; first to last. I hear hierarchical thinking in action regularly in the questions I get asked when I present or when Iâm being interviewed: âWhatâs the most important thing for new business owners to know?â âWhatâs your biggest mistake?â âWhatâs the one piece of advice . . . ?â Hierarchical thinking creates a context thatâs all about comparison and competition. Something is âbetterâ and something is âworse.â While âequalityâ is a concept everyone embraces on the surface, deeply-rooted hierarchical thinking is actually incompatible with it. If everythingâand hence everyoneâis being ranked, then consciously or not, each of us is presented with a choice: âDo I want to be better than Barbara?â Or, âDo I want to let Barbara be better than me?â âIs my business better than yours, or is yours better than mine?â
So what if we stopped thinking that way? What if we didnât worry about which restaurant was âthe highest ranked,â or which college or city was considered in the âtop tenâ? Seriously, take a minute to twoâright now if youâre willingâand give it some thought. What if we stopped arguing over who was âbest,â shared our personal preferences, and honored those of others, even when theyâre different from ours? What if we worked to get the insights out of people that reside down at the âbottomâ of the org chart? What if we cut the unnecessary competition and instead amp up the appreciation and acceptance?
Is all hierarchy bad? I donât think so. Thereâs a positive place for practical hierarchy. Someone facilitates the meeting. Someone plays quarterback. The difference is that these are agreed upon roles that people play for a particular part of their lives. But when we think hierarchically there is an unconscious belief that can sneak quietly into the conversation. That the more important the function, the âbetterâ the person who does it.
Please note, too, that Iâm not suggesting that we avoid opinions. We all have things we like better than others and we all experience things in our own way. Iâm all about the pursuit of passion. When you read this enews, youâre hearing about mine. But something I love might not be to your taste. And my perspective isnât any more important than anyone elseâs. We all get to have our own loves and our lives.
I believe if we teach ourselves how to stop thinking hierarchically, the world would look a lot different. As Ashanti Alston wrote, âWe have to get rid of hierarchical structures wherever we find them, and that we have to figure out how to create a world where . . . where everyone fits.” Beliefs would begin to change. Laws, codes, and systems could be altered accordingly. People do not systemically, intentionally, and repeatedly demean and denigrate another personâwhether itâs a coworker or someone in their communityâthat they perceive as their equal. People who are valued for who they areâat work or in the world at largeâlargely get treated with dignity. And thatâs the kind of place I want to be part of. The challenge here is mineâto cut out the ranking system in which I was raised, so I can then effectively treat everyone I interact with as the unique and amazing person they already are. Is it worth the work? Absolutely. Because as poet David Whyte, writing in The Heart Aroused: Poetry and the Preservation of the Soul in Corporate America, tells us, âThe alchemists maintained that we can create only in our own image. That is everything takes form according to the consciousness that shaped it.â